Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Dec 2006 22:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 188248
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-26
"Support of Microsoft itself is not a case of intellectual dishonesty. If you believe so, your position is devoid of logic, clouded in bias and breeds dishonesty due to a need to prove the MS position to be wrong in all cases.
That's a simple strawman, since at most I referred to a "chronic intellectual dishonesty of Microsoft advocacy". The problem, yet again, is not ignorance on your part, but willful attempts to distort.
This is not to say all of the deception is equally exercised. People have ripped into Ballmer only because he is obvious, while they let Gates get away because his deception flies completely over their heads.
This is no game: it necessarily divides people, harms society, and corrupts and squanders the most talented. How can you stomach being part of it?
Edited 2006-12-05 13:46