Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Dec 2006 12:05 UTC, submitted by sogabe
Permalink for comment 189340
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-09
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I ran BeOS for quite some time, through multiple releases, until the end. For me, it was the most beautiful OS I've ever used. Simple, clearly laid out, elegant design, and ran lightning quick. It's an old OS now, and even so it still stacks up pretty well against "modern" OSs! That's impressive. The design behind the scenes is equally impressive, the APIs are a thing of beauty, and make development a joy compared to other OSs.

To sum it up, it IS a great alternative OS, and I suspect if you give it a "fair" shot once it's production ready/stable, you'll be very impressed, and see the beauty you might miss in the screenshots.