Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 14th Dec 2006 08:14 UTC, submitted by teigetje
Permalink for comment 192062
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
I don't think many people would disagree with you. RISC OS is indeed a fine OS, even now.
However the author of these articles has done little to aid the cause of his preferred OS. Quite the reverse in fact.
The article written by John H (sorry I forget his exact name), was a far more well-reasoned article that did deserve to be aired: whether or not you agreed with him, he made his points clearly, honestly (it seemed to me), and without vitriol.
Bottom line: if an OS (any OS) works for you, fine. If not, don't stress out so much. Use another one. Life really needn't be that complicated.