Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Dec 2006 20:35 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 193199
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-20
Until someone comes up with a way similar to Apple's fat binaries (universal binaries) and manage to make it work for Windows, Linux, BSD, Solaris, Windows, etc (and on the different hardware platforms - x86, PPC, SPARC, etc) (which is also not possible because different systems go by the magic number at the beginning of the file), the closest thing to a non-OS-dependent malware would have to be a shell script (which then discludes Windows users). And shell scripts don't execute themselves, and no user using those systems would be stupid enough to enter the root password for it (though it could take out their home directory instead of ask for a password).