Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Dec 2006 22:29 UTC, submitted by John Mills
Permalink for comment 195374
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-13
It's always easy to have principles but if he had, he would have resigned almost instantaneously after the deal was closed. If you make a statement, do it at the right moment, not later.
I understand he's got new work so the cashflow will be flowing after all. Makes me wonder if it really was a principle after all. Like someone else stated: maybe hot headed.
Besides, there is a growing group of popele that sthart to understand that actions like this, without much thinking, is in fact a way how MS can amplify the FUD (simply by waiting how the linux community does it's "job").
The *real* problem will be the FSF and the upcoming GPLv3 that may cause problems. In real life, peple really like the idea about the interoperability; most don't give a damn about the patents stuff as they feel it's worthless (and so far: it is).
We're at a point where tere may be done a lot of damage from inside the linux community and we all should try to counter that, by thinking with you head instead with your stomach.
It should be seen pragmatically instead of idealistic. We've all seen that some distributions are too idealistic causing them not to be used a lot outside home.
Edited 2006-12-22 09:23