Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Jan 2007 23:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 199717
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-08
There are NAS devices and routers that supports plugging in USB hard drives and acts as a server. I don't see how Windows Home Server has a large market.
For example, I just help a friend set up a Linksys NSLU2 device with external USB one touch hard drives.
For the average joe, isn't it easier to run one of these devices and plug in more USB HDs as needed rather than running a Windows Home Server edition?
On top of that, I would believe the size and cost of devices such as the NSLU2 would be less or equal to the cost of the Windows server.
The only reason I can see a *need* for MS Home server edition is that, due to DRM restrictions, only a MS server with DRM serving support would allow media playback on other computers on the same network.