Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Jan 2007 20:56 UTC, submitted by John Mills
Permalink for comment 200408
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-09
I've read a lot of talk back comments here suggesting NSA paid Microsoft to put backdoors in Windows Vista.
If linux is so secure and NSA wants backdoors in the OS, then why would the NSA ever use linux? After all it is so secure they could never penatrate it.
Didn't NSA develop the SELinux specification? Why should we trust it?
Maybe the NSA shouldn't use linux, after all, they can't break into it.
Why stop with backdoors. NSA should pay MS to put in rootkits, viruses and other forms of malware. NSA has a large budget, they can afford it.
Heck, MS should create a special NSA edition of Windows specifically designed to be unlocked by and only by the NSA.
Does this sound as ridiculous to you as it does to most sane people? I would think so.