Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Jan 2007 23:53 UTC, submitted by danB
Permalink for comment 200555
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-01
This story is also carried by the BBC[1], which points out that Cisco has owned the trademark since 2000, and that Cisco brand Linksys released an internet phone called the iPhone just a couple of weeks ago.
Now anyone who's tried to use the word "pod" in a product knows how fanatical Apple are about their trademarks. There's no possible way that they could have missed this, and yet they went ahead with the launch. This means that
a) They're willing to pay Cisco a lot of money for either ownership or licence of the trademark
b) They're going to fight it in court, most probably by trying to argue all names of the form "iAnything" belong to Apple.
If it's (a), it raises the question of why they didn't do this prior to the announcement, to avoid all this unpleasant publicity.
If it's (b), then that's a very scary prospect indeed.
[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm