Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Jan 2007 23:53 UTC, submitted by danB
Permalink for comment 200587
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-08
Of course, Cisco wants a piece of the pie. They had the name a long time ago but nobody cared about it. Suddenly knowing that Apple was going to release their phones a some point very soon, they release their IPhone.
I still believe that Apple will change the name to something else before release and basically leave Cisco in the dust.
I am not saying Apple was not asking for it but for goodness sake, the product is not even shipping yet.