Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Jan 2007 20:47 UTC, submitted by ciaran

Permalink for comment 200774
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2006-09-18
"When has Stallman ever advocated violating a so-called "commercial license"? -rajj"
Near the beginning of the article we're discussing.
"[Section: Freedom two]
Freedom two is essential on fundamental ethical grounds, so that you can live an upright, ethical life as a member of your community. If you use a program that does not give you freedom number two, you're in danger of falling at any moment into a moral dilema. When your friend says "that's a nice program, could I have a copy?" At that moment, you will have to choose between two evils. One evil is: give your friend a copy and violate the licence of the program. The other evil is: deny your friend a copy and comply with the licence of the program.
Once you are in that situation, you should choose the lesser evil. The lesser evil is to give your friend a copy and violate the licence of the program. -Stallman" followed by [laughter]
I would say maybe he was joking because of the laughter... but then he goes on to explain "It may be the right thing to do, but it's not entirely good."