Linked by Thomas Leonard on Tue 16th Jan 2007 00:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 202176
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-15
Well I know for one that backward compatibility is not solved in the windows world. For example Navision (a MS product), can not run on windows Vista.
Backward compatibility has also it's drawbacks in speed: as in being forced to keep all drivers ever created to be supported, i.e. USB-drivers in windows vs the fasted drivers for USB in linux.
Compatability on binary level is disease that has more drawbacks than it is good for and is something that the open source world circumvents quite well: on source level.It should not be introduced in the open source world.