Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 21st Jan 2007 17:42 UTC, submitted by danwarne
Permalink for comment 204124
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-04-21
[/] That's how it has always worked for MS - people are lazy in general and therefore cannot grasp that there are enough alternatives around. [/i]
In which case either NOT buying a new PC or installing Linux instead is the solution? That sounds pretty "lazy" to me, but also common sense, if your PC still works.
But it's funny to listen to all these people condemning Vista and hailing the wonderful 2000 or XP ...
Well maybe that's because Vista doesn't really feel like an OS that's been in development for five years? I doubt many of the people who were using Linux/BSD/BeOS when XP came out now think that XP is somehow a suitable replacement for Linux - indeed, the reverse is probably more true now than ever.
Think about it: five years and still there's no drivers or software or anything. I thought Microsoft were supposed to work closely with vendors or something (not least on Firefox, as reported by this very site some time ago, which according to the present article still has problems with Vista despite Microsoft's "help"). Although if their "help" writing apps is as good as the "Help" they put in their programs, I'd advise any old grannies needing to cross One Microsoft Way* not to accept their "help".
Honestly, with the number of apps needing an update to work with Vista and yet not coming out with one, you could be forgiven for thinking they' been spending the last five years converting them to work on Linux.
*Notice how they named it that without irony?
Edited 2007-01-21 23:41