Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Jan 2007 02:53 UTC, submitted by spectator
Permalink for comment 204284
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
"Define 'bloated'."
This bloated discussion is just sooo stupid. There is nothing wrong with Gnome or KDE, it's just an other approach of desktop usage. The direction Xfce has chosen is 'minimal but still usable'. If you don't like this approach, feel free to choose an other desktop environment (or a mix of them), you HAVE that freedom on Linux/BSD so use it!
It's a bit silly to say Xfce is not good because you're using KDE, Gnome or whatever. Other people are happy with Xfce, so what's wrong with that?
Maybe the memory usage of Xfce is a bit lower, it starts 1 second faster, so what? Most important is you're happy when you start you're computer and it suits your needs!