Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Jan 2007 14:57 UTC, submitted by iangibson
Permalink for comment 206348
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-15
Benchmarks are for the simple minded, because they don't say anything if you don't know every advantage/disadvantage of the tested system.
>Demonstrate that FreeBSD has as good of hardware support as Linux in benchmarks and I'll change my mind.
Why? Your problem is you muddle up FUD and hype with stability and reliability.
>Until then a man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument...:-)
A word based on FUD isn't anything to cope with. The attitude "show me something and I will think about it" isn't the attitude of *BSD people. They know what they are doing, stay with Linux and live in a world of fantasy, buzzwords and so on.
Most *BSD people are from Linux or commercial Unices - think about it. Most people in Linux world are from Windows, something to consider too :o)