Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Feb 2007 01:12 UTC, submitted by jayson.knight
Permalink for comment 207894
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
I thought Allchin announced his retirement plans before Gates did. Maybe I'm wrong, but this has been planned for a long time.
If you want a name and face to associate with the <understatement> problematic </understatement> Vista development cycle, this is the guy. He accomplished great things for Microsoft through much of his career, but Vista will tarnish his legacy.
You can almost understand Ballmer's chair-throwing habit when you consider what you would do if your legendary senior executive fails to deliver in such spectacular fashion.
Under Allchin, the MS Windows Group had traditionally thrived on a culture that resembles an academic colloquium. If you put enough grade A geniuses together, give them flexibility, and cultivate their creativity, then good things follow. The exponential complexity of the Windows product invalidated this approach, and Allchin didn't make the appropriate adjustments.
It seems like a he was an executive that the engineers trusted and respected, rather than the management-oriented kind that engineers tend to despise (but get the job done on time).