Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Feb 2007 11:30 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 208317
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-17
The reason Microsoft decided to get involved with Novell is that MS has finally realized that Linux isn't going away. But they also realize that there is a market of companies that aren't anti-Microsoft and aren't religious about Linux. They just see Linux as a cost-effective solution in certain scenarios, such as file servers, and wouldn't be averse to purchasing Linux solutions from a Microsoft partner (or even Microsoft itself).
I definitely fall into this category personally.
For the record, I'm typing this on a 15" MacBook Pro. I have machines that run Linux (Ubuntu Server), Mac OS X Server (on a little Mac mini), and Windows Server 2003 Web Edition. There are things I love and hate about all three. For me it's about the tech, and I know there are many out there like me.