Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Feb 2007 16:48 UTC, submitted by Flatline
Microsoft Microsoft executives pondered whether to remove the company's name from a 2002 report done by research firm IDC that touted Windows total cost of ownership over Linux, according to e-mail messages entered into evidence in an Iowa antitrust case. The report, which IDC released in December 2002 and was plugged by Microsoft in its then-new "Get the Facts" publicity campaign against Linux, compared total cost of ownership of Windows 2000 and Linux server software. The IDC study, which was identified as Microsoft sponsored when it debuted, claimed that Windows 2000 offered a lower TCO in four of five enterprise scenarios. Before its release, however, company executives worried that adding Microsoft's moniker would only fuel the fire from Linux partisans.
Permalink for comment 208769
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Get the Facts"
by Priest on Sat 3rd Feb 2007 18:14 UTC
Priest
Member since:
2006-05-12

Because I am sure if they didn't put their name on it, nobody would have suspected a national campaign with the purpose's of touting lower TCO of windows was sponsored by MS.

Although, I do believe that bloggers and other outlets expecting all the same rights and freedoms as reporters should be required to disclose these types of business relationships.

You can't have it both ways.

Edited 2007-02-03 18:17

Reply Score: 2