Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Feb 2007 14:44 UTC, submitted by Floris Lambrechts
ReactOS In preparation to hist talk at the upcoming FOSDEM conference in Brussels, ReactOS project leader Aleksey Bragin in an interview details the code audit that the project is going trough, and reveals the intellectual property minefield that such a large reverse engineered OS brings. "I can't stress this enough: up to now, no suspicious or illegal code has been found during the audit. Buggy code - yes, this was either fixed or rewritten. Also, another part which is sometimes speculated about - that the remaining 3% of the unaudited codebase is illegal - this is completely wrong."
Permalink for comment 209038
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Not true
by Morin on Sun 4th Feb 2007 15:28 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Not true"
Morin
Member since:
2005-12-31

As said before, it would be close to impossible to write a boot sector that does *not* look copied. You'd have to artificially make it look different, but then you could do the same with copied code too. Do you have a more striking example of copied, but marked 'audited' code?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2