Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Feb 2007 16:43 UTC, submitted by mwtomlinson
Permalink for comment 209074
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-13
"Not so. The agreement is null and void as you cannot sue a customer due to patent infringement. "
which leaves the deal about interoperability -- so again the question stays: why would it be a problem? If Novell changes code to GPL code, by using MS information, it has to release that code too.
Any efforts to try to stop this kind of deals basically translate into: "hey I do not want interoperability!" and that exactly is what FSF for whatever reason is aiming at.
How good can that be?
Novell always has adhered to the GPL stuff and has given back all kind of changes. There is no reason to believe that it will do different anytime soon.
There are pragmatic people and idiologists. These two streams are growing apart quite a bit. Do we reallyw ant that?