Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Feb 2007 21:48 UTC, submitted by Michael
3D News, GL, DirectX "Last October we had compared the performance of the open-source R300 display driver against the closed-source fglrx driver for ATI Radeon graphics cards. In that comparison a Mobility Radeon X300 was used with X.Org 7.1, but we have decided to take another look at this driver comparison under X.Org 7.2. In this last comparison, the fglrx binary blob had greatly outperformed the open-source driver. While the fglrx driver remains faster, has the performance delta between these two drivers decreased?"
Permalink for comment 209899
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: why
by Damind on Tue 6th Feb 2007 23:48 UTC in reply to "RE: why"
Member since:

Good points. Do not like some of them but none the less good. Still think we should put the pressure on the hardware maker to come out with the drivers as needed as is the case with MS. New drivers come out all the time on MS. We need to decide where to focus our energy and do so effectively so we can get the type of support we need.

What I notice is that allot of people in the open source community seem to for get people are in business to make money and if money is not being made then the community will not be.

That is my 2cents.

Reply Parent Score: 1