Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 8th Feb 2007 04:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 210711
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
Good points indeed, malkia and frozen5555 but don't you still think they stripped Windows (2000 and XP) to make it easier to port programs but thought about the interface later?
Arguably the most important GUI widget of Windows is the taskbar. They just left that out of WM, but the rest still feels very 'Windowy'. I still think the interface is a mix of (bad) ideas and there is no consistency.
Palm looks dated now I fully agree, but what I loved most was the 'never save' interface, a program just came back instantaneous. I don't think this is possible any more with MP3 players and wifi etc. But, just imagine a central place (taskbar!) where you can manage your programs, and a major upgrade to Palm OS (using either linux or v6 palmos or beos tech) to bring it into the 21st century with old Palm support by the use of an emulator (Styletap + palm v3 technology?), while keeping long battery life (I think a week should still be possible). At least the palm interface was consistent and snappy.