Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Feb 2007 18:59 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Permalink for comment 213857
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't want to configure much and I'd prefer it just worked without changing any settings

I'm saying this with no offensive intent, please try to take it as being so. What I feel fairly frequently, when people start to talk about configurability and customisability differences between Gnome and KDE, that the people who say I-don't-want-to-spend- my-life-configuring-things have to come from some other planet, or maybe from another galaxy.
What I mean by this is that why on earth should anyone spend any amount of time configuring his x desktop, apart from an initial setup and maybe once or twice a year when personal preferences might change considerably for a reason. Do these people install linuxes so often that this becomes an issue ? Then, if they install so much, why do they say they don't have time to spend on configuring the desktop ? Or they don't know how to save their settings ?
All in all, my opinion is, that after some time spent for customizing one's desktop (Gnome or KDE or whatever else), the later relatively minor configuration changes should be easy to do and giving as much free hand in doing so as humanly possible. Considering this, I always found KDE more easy to manage and always becoming easier, while when doing similar minor changes in Gnome often resulted in hairs being pulled out, faces getting deep scratches and mothers' being mentioned in not so polite contexts.
What I've always wanted to have in Gnome is a master switch to change into some uber user mode where I'd have the flexibility and modularity of kde behaving like gnome. Yeah, tell me about bad dreams