Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Feb 2007 18:45 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
X11, Window Managers David Reveman writes: "I'd like to get all of you updated on the compiz related things discussed at the X developer conference that was held last week. My talk was mainly focused on 'what's next' and how to get desktop compositing in X to the next level." He also discussed the fork: "I had the chance to talk to Quinn Storm from the beryl project during xdevconf. I would have hoped that the current situation with beryl could be improved but it seems like Quinn at least isn't interested in that. However, after talking to Quinn it's very clear to me that the fork was partially motivated by assumptions that were wrong."
Permalink for comment 214177
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: sour grapes?
by on Sun 18th Feb 2007 18:50 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: sour grapes?"
Member since:

Yeah i really want that list ;)

So you thnik Compiz sucks ? Well beryl is fork of compiz... and after fork it still syncs compiz code so you shuld now say BERYL sucks too, because 99 % beryl "core" code is still compiz code, there ware no significantly changes. And the almost all users and developers of beryl dont say nothing about that in official statments or official discussion (this disscussion is good example). Only poison ;) and personal attacks, Star Trek ? angry geeks ? so i this is your technical arguments ? constructive comments ?

Reply Parent Score: 2