Linked by Mike Bouma on Mon 22nd Aug 2005 09:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 21424
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-10
why DX and not OpenGL?
Nobody said anything about DX. NOVA will have about the same capabilities as DirectX9, e.g. using vertex and pixel shaders. The current implementation is based on a Warp3D compatible MiniGL system.
Is this going to be like Linux crapfest with so many different companies providing bits n bobs bundled ? If so then im definately not interested.
Its still 80s in the Amiga world, time to catch up. 68k emulation, for the life of god please just MOVE ON!
Yes, you really should move on. Why do you keep posting, if you are "definitely NOT interested"?