Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 4th Mar 2007 22:10 UTC, submitted by martini
Permalink for comment 218588
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-18
http://www.guidebookgallery.org/pics/gui/desktop/full/win31.png (1994)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Am_windows95_desktop.png (1995)
http://www.guidebookgallery.org/pics/gui/desktop/firstrun/macos90-1... (1999)
vs.
http://www.ecomstation.org/screenshots/nsones.jpg (2007)
hmm ... tough one.
It's not the matter of crystal icons. It's not even about eye candy or effects. It's about something that is offensive to the eye. I happen to be a designer, and maybe I'm a little over sensitive to this matters, but let's face it people, it's downright ugly.
Maybe it's more functional and feature packed that Windows, Linux and OS X altogether, let's forget about that ... but it looks like something the cat dragged in from 1993.