Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Mar 2007 23:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 219289
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-10
You know it's really amazing seeing you guys talk about Open formats. Because both are Open. You guys are just measuring who is more Open now. It is honestly very juvenile to ignore something a company brings to the table just because you don't like the company.
If Microsoft invented a cure for cancer, and gave it away for free, all you guys would be arguing over if the process for the cure of cancer was open. I have seen the OOS community totally ignore .NET because it came from Microsoft, even though it is more open and more standardized than Java. But since Java isn't produced by Microsoft you don't really care if it is standardized or open. You are just anti-Microsoft, not really pro Open Source.
BTW I know Java has just been recently released. And probably on the path to being standardized. However that still doesn't excuse the last 5 years.