Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Mar 2007 23:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 219291
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-06
You know it's really amazing seeing you guys talk about Open formats. Because both are Open.
No matter how many times you repeat it, OOXML is only as open as the undocumented specs it inherits. That is, not open at all.
If Microsoft invented a cure for cancer, and gave it away for free, all you guys would be arguing over if the process for the cure of cancer was open.
If a cure for cancer was developed and MS came with a pack of tobacco, you'd be argueing MS' solution was better because it's backwards compatible.
I have seen the OOS community totally ignore .NET because it came from Microsoft, even though it is more open and more standardized than Java.
Well, I don't like java, you'll need another argument to disqualify my opinion on this.