Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Mar 2007 18:01 UTC, submitted by Joel Dahl
Permalink for comment 219685
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
While the concept of OSS is good, taking it to the extreme of not supporting, or including non Open Source software (like the GPL2 only on Linux for example) is not good for the customers, and technicians. And if a license agreement is needed, include it at the system installation, or package installation phase, also warning the user that if the person denies the agreement, the hardware will not be supported (available) on the system.
That would make everyone happy.
PS. And except maybe for lawyers, who reads a license these days???