Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Mar 2007 22:41 UTC
Windows "This article is an overview that discusses the differences and similarities between Windows XP Starter Edition and Windows XP Home Edition. These differences are discussed for entertainment, networking and sharing, printers, system requirements, languages, and security and safety features. This article is part of a series written to provide support to independent software vendors interested in designing programs for Windows Starter."
Permalink for comment 219880
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not slimmed down enough
by cushioncritter on Fri 9th Mar 2007 03:55 UTC
cushioncritter
Member since:
2007-01-12

Microsoft as usual is parlaying the concept that "leaving out" parts of XP can allow it to run on "legacy hardware" such as a 233MHz machine with 64M RAM; as it does with other products like "XP Embedded", etc. This is a great distortion, most people find a machine that takes over 3 minutes to complete the boot process and 1-2 minutes (with great hard drive churning and noise) to open a small program to be unacceptable.

The problem is that Windows is total bloatware and is not easily reduceed into anything resembling "lean and mean" with any reasonable amount of effort. I find the minimum reasonable hardware for XP (any version) is Pentium III 400+ with 192M RAM and EIDE drive.

Try downloading "Starter XP" and running on the "minimum hardware" if you doubt my test results.

Reply Score: 1