Linked by David Adams on Tue 23rd Aug 2005 15:41 UTC, submitted by kellym
Permalink for comment 22015
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
From what I can see, reading various tests, Pentium M [PM]overperforms Turion (at same clock speed*) almost in all aspects, let it be power consumption (PM consumes less, esp. under load) or game performance (PM is much faster). There are only some syntetic and some mostly mathematical tests, where Turion wins (by a very little margin).
* same clock speed means that PM has equivalent good, if not better internal design than Turion (compare with Pentium 4 vs AMD tests, wvhere AMD usually wins).
Well, I've been AMD user or many years:) I hope AMD will answer to Pentium M technolgy with something 'cooler' (in whatever sense you prefer), maybe in year 2007. Competiton makes both products better.