Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Mar 2007 17:52 UTC, submitted by Bernd
Permalink for comment 221647
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-15
Moulinneuf... you should learn to read and interpret english (yes, yes... i know my english is far from perfect)
"BSD-Like" means that the license is not a BSD license (and probably has a completely diferent name) but most of the license is similar to BSD
When Soulbender said "None of the below projects are GPL:" he didn't said that it was BSD, he said it *WAS NOT* GPL, although not completely correct (because perl). Once again you misinterpreted someone and said he implied that all that projects where BSD License.
I will not comment all the others mistakes you made in all yours posts here. But you should read things carefully and try to not troll so much
By the way... i am not a OpenBSD user (I use Mac OS X as Desktop/Development and Solaris 10/OpenSuse for 2 servers) but its common sense that OpenBSD is probably the most secure for a server... and again... if you do some googling about openbsd, the way their developers work and their goals, you will understand why probably OpenBSD is the most secure OS.