Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Mar 2007 15:30 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Permalink for comment 221821
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-09
"Seriously though, I'd rather have a rock solid version once a year instead of a buggy one every six months followed by a stable one. "
I agree with you. I cannot understand why a year release cycle can produce a buggy distro, compared to a six month cycle.
In my opinion, Mandriva have a good set of tools to install and configure the system. The package manager its great, when it works. He needs a lot of works to handled error message in a way that the user can understand whats happening (like, I have a lot of packages that he lists, and when I click over it, he says "This package cannot be installed". Why? God knows... but apart of that, its a great program too.
But, Mandriva faced that a year release cicle would produce a distro with old packages, but today the target user of Mandriva waits for a stable release, not a bleeding edge distro. I used 2005 until january of this year, and I only upgraded because I had troubles with my computer. And I miss so much 2005, he worked so good to me...