Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Mar 2007 21:37 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes I wrote the following article for university. It tries to explain the difference between three kernel types in such a way that less-computer savvy people should understand it. I had a 1500 word limitation, so detailed elaborations were out of the question. "In this article, I will try to make the 'microkernel vs. monolithic kernel' debate more accessible and understandable for laymen. I will explain the purpose of a kernel, after which I will detail the differences between the two competing designs. Finally, I will introduce the hybrid design, which aims to combine the two. In the conclusion, I will argue that this hybrid design is the most common kernel type in the world of personal computers today." Because of the limitations, this article contains little news for most of you. Still, I thought I'd share.
Permalink for comment 223592
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: hybrid kernel
by crystall on Thu 22nd Mar 2007 14:55 UTC in reply to "RE: hybrid kernel"
crystall
Member since:
2007-02-06

Well, actually XNU removed the memory protection from Mach in exchange for speed and the ability to implement BSD services inside which in my eyes make it mostly a monolithic kernel even though it is based on Mach 3.0 which was a microkernel.

Reply Parent Score: 1