Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Mar 2007 20:44 UTC, submitted by theosib
Permalink for comment 226109
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I think that this article makes some really good points, especially regarding the Application Directory issue.
It's about elegance and clean design. The internal design of Linux, with files strewn here and there, seems like a mish-mash, design by committee style standard, and the Windows method is also flawed.
The guys on here complaining about the article just have a different mindset, like the author mentions about the designers of Windows, they just don't 'grok' what he is talking about.
But if you are not a 'geek' with a techie mind, and are an artist or a designer, you should understand. It's about reducing cognitive load, making system maintenance easier for 'normal' users, and making things more logical and standardised. Its about caring for and taking pleasure in elegant designs and solutions.
PS -- Yes, RISC OS did have it before the Mac, AFAIK.
Edited 2007-03-30 23:54