Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Apr 2007 21:11 UTC, submitted by judgen
Permalink for comment 226902
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
Actually, OS/2 had a nice sizeable userbase... Once. IBM just didn't want to pony up the dough to support their consumer/SOHO OS. The support cost would probably be astronomical compared to their mainframe dept.

I suspect that Microsoft's victory would be complete by now if it were not for the unexpected arrival of Linux and OSS.
I completely agree. With mention of the revival of Apple Inc and Jobs' second coming.
I know you do not like Linux and OSS. But you have to admit that they have complicated MS's plans for absolute world domination.
I do like Linux. I don't have a need for it. Ditto for OSS. I use OSS apps all the time. I just think that the OSS fundamentalists and GNU/RMS should read "All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten" by Robert Fulghum. And yes I know that MS' OS dominance is challenged. Competition will make it all good.