Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Apr 2007 22:00 UTC, submitted by michuk
Permalink for comment 229464
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-31
The author compares the compatibility of SugarUI with advanced cell phones: "The capabilities of the applications that come with OLPC aren’t much better than those of modern cell phones." Anyone can concur with the author on this point.
However: "In the not-so-poor countries like Mexico or Brazil, when the kids usually have some idea about computing and High Tech, OLPC may have problems with being usable enough." I believe making a comparison in the Third World is misleading because it doesn't take cost into consideration. It only takes features into consideration. Although OLPC is $100, a "modern cell phone" is probably around $500, not including the cost of cell phone bills. That makes advanced cell phones economically out of reach. Even if they weren't, cell phones do not have as nice as a user interface as a laptop for word processing or web browsing.