Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Apr 2007 22:00 UTC, submitted by michuk
Permalink for comment 229870
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-02
(...)
Most had trouble adjusting to the more advanced technology at their disposal in Canada. Most of them had used computers before, but the changes in interfaces and functionality led to some very big hurdles for them to overcome.
This is where we disagree...I think it's still better to have used the OLPC with Sugar than no computer at all.
You say that students from developing countries had trouble adjusting to the more advanced technologies, but that doesn't mean that those who had used other UIs (which would have to be DOS or Windows 3.x to represent a major difference) were at a disadvantage compared to those who had *never* used a computer.
I guess we'll have to wait and see. I disagreed with the UI at first, but I now I think it can prove to be rather useful (not unlike the UI of a palmtop PC).