Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Apr 2007 19:03 UTC, submitted by fiji2
Permalink for comment 232620
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-28
I'm really curious to know what is the point of your "demonstration".
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=cri&period=all&prod=2719
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=cri&period=all&prod=96
By the way, i never pretended that linux were more secure, actually, i don't mind, they both have a security level well above i need for my use.
I just wanted to say that the "hundreds" patches thing was not an argument to complain about Mac OS X patches discussions we see at each patch releases.