Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Apr 2007 22:27 UTC, submitted by editingwhiz
Permalink for comment 236123
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-12
Actually, I'm finding that hardware support, in the form of non-standard and/or (gasp!) non-free drivers, makes a difference. For example, my laptop works happily with the old rt2500 driver. I haven't tried the very latest rt2x00 driver, but the version in the Fedora development kernels of about three weeks ago did not work. Ubuntu includes the old rt2500 driver so wireless works out of the box on my laptop. With Fedora, I have to compile the driver myself. For the newbie, this is a clear Ubuntu win. On my desktop machine, the wireless card requires the Atheros driver. Again, Ubuntu just works, whereas with Fedora I have to either go hunting for an old kernel for which the required modules have already been created (ATrpms to the rescue) or compile myself. As long as the distro chosen by Dell supports the hardware on which it's being offered, its a win for Linux, GNU, freedom, Mom, apple pie, etc...