Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd May 2007 18:29 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 236946
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-13
In fairness, it's a case of using the right tool for the right job. Fedora never claimed to be a platform optimized for long term, stable deployments; I remember back when I jumped back into linux with FC3, it wasn't even recommended for any sort of production use, it's bleeding edge nature was what attracted me to it as a re-entry point.
If all you need is xterm/emacs/vim/whatever and value stability, then really, Fedora isn't the ideal distro. Debian stable is ideally suited to that sort of situation, or even CentOS if you want to stay in the RH fold.
It's also a question of perceived need; the Fedora legacy project (I believe that was the name) was intended to provide longer term support for older releases, but simply failed to generate enough interest. I just don't think that's Fedora's target market.