Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 238561
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
There are more articles
Lets review them:
http://www.techsphere.org/wordpress/2007/05/08/microsoft-withdraws-.....
Mark Russinovich tells how hackers would find a way around UAC through social engineering or by compromising applications that run with higher privileges.
Duh. No OS is immune to that.
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39286677,00.htm
Man wrote the tool which can enable/disable protected processes. Requires loading a driver, needs to be running with elevated privileges.
If you load bad driver in the kernel that's your fault, not OS. Moreover, that binary doesnt work on 64bit Vista.
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38926
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39087
No comments, typical inq "humorous" BS.
http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/08/security-built-in-to-vista-fails...
Windows Defender didnt detect all running spyware.
Not an issue since there should be no spyware in the first place. I never had any malware on my Windows boxes.
, Vista is abhorrent:
None of the articles you provided lead to this conclusion, try again.