Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Windows Months go, I reviewed Windows Vista, and concluded: "All in all, I am impressed by Windows Vista [...]. Windows Vista is better than XP, and definitely more than just an improved look as many say." After 5 months of usage, it is time to put that statement into perspective.
Permalink for comment 238561
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: I agree, fair review
by stare on Tue 8th May 2007 22:02 UTC in reply to "RE[9]: I agree, fair review"
Member since:

There are more articles

Lets review them:
Mark Russinovich tells how hackers would find a way around UAC through social engineering or by compromising applications that run with higher privileges.

Duh. No OS is immune to that.,1000000189,39286677,00.htm
Man wrote the tool which can enable/disable protected processes. Requires loading a driver, needs to be running with elevated privileges.

If you load bad driver in the kernel that's your fault, not OS. Moreover, that binary doesnt work on 64bit Vista.

No comments, typical inq "humorous" BS.
Windows Defender didnt detect all running spyware.

Not an issue since there should be no spyware in the first place. I never had any malware on my Windows boxes.

, Vista is abhorrent:

None of the articles you provided lead to this conclusion, try again.

Reply Parent Score: 1