Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 238568
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Even if you're playing an unprotected video in WMP, the video and WMP are still actively protected from being recorded or modified.
I don't use WMP and my CPU utilization while playing media content is the same as on W2K. Of course, there are absolutely no problems recording and modifying video.
Vista checks regularly that it is not being tampered with, Patch Guard protects the kernal.
RTFM, PatchGuard has nothing to do with DRM.
There is an overall increase in background CPU usage solely for the DRM protections that go into Vista, protected content or not.
Prove it with facts.