Linked by Mohit Ranka on Thu 17th May 2007 15:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 241108
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Fairly muddy read. Most of the historical data was hard to sort out - was Google evil for putting books online for search? Much of the historical data presented made Goodle seem heroic, standing up against those who want to repress information - like the books example and the Youtube example.
The only real "evil" presented was the Double-click purchase, which remains to be seen what Google will do. Perhaps they will be "good" for Double-click.
The only point of the article really seems to be that "All you data are belong to Google". Therefore, the only real evil presented is that someday Google "might" do something evil with it. This is true of AOL, your ISP, your Bank, your Pastor, etc, etc.
Whatever.