Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th May 2007 18:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 241210
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-13
Having a single menu for multiple programs, while it might make a slight saving of screen space is essentially flawed because it requires the user to switch windows before they can access the other menus.
Think about it this way: two programs open, select some text, use the menu of program A to copy, and the menu of program B to paste.
And on a Mac: two programs open, select some text, use the menu of program A to copy, select program B, use menu of program B to paste.
Yes, this is a very simplified way of looking at it, and sure for some the difference would be unnoticeable (ALT+TAB is the best), but it still doesn't have any obvious advantage other than you always know where the menubar is.
Edit: Not that I think the feature shouldn't be added if people want it, just as people got used to Windows I guess some got used to MacOS.
Edited 2007-05-17 19:49