Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th May 2007 18:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 241254
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-28
there is some fundamental error in the "it's off by default, who cares, put it in" argument that I strongly need to point out. features, even off by default (which are the worst ones) are a maintainership burden. they introduce bugs, code changes and different code paths that affect how the applications and libraries behave. this is even worse if the feature must be turned on: it means it won't get proper and widespread testing upon release and that changes in the code might silently break it without the maintainers noticing.
a "off-by-default" feature *never* comes for free; so don't ask for an "off-by-default" feature: either ask for GNOME to have a desktop menu bar or not.
Edited 2007-05-17 20:23