Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th May 2007 18:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 241337
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
I'm primarily a Windows user these days, but I have to admit that I much prefer the Mac style single menubar, and miss it when using other operating systems.
It saves screen space, significantly speeds up access to menu items (Fitts' law), and provides a consistent location for menus, increasing muscle memory. It has a few disadvantages, but in my opinion they're very minor compared with the clear benefits.
Overall I think it would be a great addition to GNOME, much more valuable than any number of cosmetic tweaks and eye-candy effects.
I tried the option of a single menubar in KDE, but there were too many non-KDE apps that I needed to run. Having a menubar at the top of the screen, and another in many application windows, just made it a cluttered usability disaster.
Maybe if GNOME supported a single menubar, GNOME apps could be made compatible with the option in KDE. With the single menubar option turned on in either DE, all KDE/GNOME apps would use it. That's the kind of consistency needed to make it a really useful option.