Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th May 2007 22:36 UTC, submitted by Chris Williams
Permalink for comment 241702
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-19
"but it doesn't seem to contradict Open Source Definition."
A cursory look says it breaks the Open Source definition in 3 separate ways.
1: Free redistribution - the license prevents you from shipping hardware with this code without paying a royalty.
6: No Discrimination against field of endeavour - The license prevents you from using the code on anything other the ARM based platforms.
8: License must not be specific to a product - This license is written specifically for the RISC OS product, and could not be used on other projects.