Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 19th May 2007 20:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 241803
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-09
As much as I'd like to see a linux native version, I've got my doubts that we'll actually see one. Even though Linux has practically the same market penetration that Apple did in the mid-90s when StarCraft was released, Blizzard doesn't seem to be in a hurry to support Linux like they did Macs.
World of Warcraft, even though it has supposedly been ported to linux, perhaps even having a linux-native client available from day 1 according to some rumors, has never been made available for linux. Blizzard might be all for it, but I think the problem in this case lies not with the development company but with the accountants of the parent company not wanting to support a platform they know nothing about.
Its really too bad that game companies don't support linux. Of the circle of friends I played with back when the original starcraft was released, only one still uses windows and only one uses a mac, and even then its only his laptop and not his main machine. Its not that we don't still play games and aren't willing to spend $50 on a new game, there just simply are so rarely any games for us to buy, and so we buy consoles and console games.