Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd May 2007 21:05 UTC, submitted by Nix_User
PC-BSD LinuxHelp has reviewed PC-BSD. "PC-BSD is turning out to be an excellent alternative to other desktop operating systems. After testing and using PC-BSD for some time now, I can't but admire the sheer amount of work that is put into creating, developing and molding an OS for the lay person albeit with a strong slant towards FreeBSD. The fact that PC-BSD is able to accomplish all the tasks expected by an end user - be it using the Internet for communication, listening to music, watching movies or using it for recreation purposes holds it in good stead as a viable desktop operating systems."
Permalink for comment 242767
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Or... are you just spewing nonsense just because Microsoft made extended partitions?

In terms of how the disk is used, there are only two main differences between a primary and a logical partition or volume. The first is that a primary partition can be set as bootable (active) while a logical cannot. In reality You can have up to 4 extended partitions. Many OSes (Windows) can only deal with one though. Microsoft says there can be one extended partition. So be it. Linux is ****ed as usual.

FreeBSD on x86 systems suffers from the same limitation of four primary partitions; however, in FreeBSD parlance, the 'parimary partitions' are the 'slices' 1 - 4; in addition, in FreeBSD parlance, the *working* equivalent of DOS 'extended partitions' are called 'partitions.' That is, FreeBSD 'partitions' in FreeBSD perform the same task as DOS 'extended partitions' in DOS. This difference in terminology often confuses newcomers to FreeBSD. To further confuse newcomers, DOS extended partitions, as well as primary partitions, are recognized as slices under FreeBSD. Although, FreeBSD is limited to 4 bootable FreeBSD slices, it can mount more than four slices, be they FreeBSD slices, or slices corresponding to other OS partitioning schemes. In this manner, FreeBSD is far more flexible.

Reply Parent Score: 1