Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd May 2007 23:50 UTC, submitted by irbis
Permalink for comment 242951
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-30
His point is that people can't easily contribute to OpenSolaris, which is true. To submit code you have to run it by a Sun staff member first, and there is a whole process to doing that. Sun knows this isn't typical for OSS (and I assume they know it sucks), and they're said to be working on it.
I can imagine how hard it would be for a closed software house to open their work up to joe on the street.
But whatever you do, don't think that OpenSolaris has few community patches because it is less buggy. It has plenty of bugs and even more room for improvement. 69 fixes were delivered already today, for instance: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/search.do?process=1&category=&subcatego...